Skip to main content

the final blog

The way this course was designed has helped. I think it’s the way these topics are taken from different perspectives- from the historian, different political views and the lecturer. Because we are forced, or really I guess it is up to us, to read and appreciate what’s happened and how all of that had built up into what design is today. I think there has been some effective learning here although perhaps some more class discussions would contribute to this.

I think that being able to identify or actually being able to understand why some things are done has helped me personally to interpret design and what it’s about to me. Learning about the reasoning behind why people created works of art and design due to social/political influences as well as their own contexts and backgrounds has made me think about why I do, not just design but really anything and what it means. So I guess this class has helped me, it’s a nice change from solely focussing on big hand ins and projects- something I can build on and somehow contribute to.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cuba Street- the Political Campaign

A Political campaigner carrying a small child or a tray of ready made frozen bullets retailed at $14.99. Who wins your vote? The thought of what’s now culturally sensitive and insensitive in this modern world can still be viewed through a conservative viewpoint. How we interpret its aura through its visual language is determined by what has been hammered into us as socially acceptable. Regardless of whether we symbolize a child being carried as a ‘pure’ thought or frozen ice bullets as ‘impure’ our initial opinions and feelings fall under that social code. Perhaps we have only touched on what it is to be ‘culturally rich’ and base our ideals on the thought that in order to look forward you must look back.
Post a Comment
Read more

Postmodernism + Remix

This postmodernist painting titled, Don’t forget your scarf, by Banksy is an example of how “the past always tries to control the future.” It shows how the mother is trying to influence her view upon her youth because of her own past experiences. Here, she is trying to protect her son by covering him up with a red scarf, while at the same time disguising his voice and distorting his opinions. One can only assume that she is the one doing the talking, expressing a subtle command that he has no way to refute. The context of the painting becomes especially important because it is an ironic family portrait- meticulously embroidered with a glimpse of how two generations contrast but are joined together. It shows what is viewed as a socially acceptable youth compared to the display of the loving mother’s more ‘wholesome’ generation and attitude of the past. It therefore reveals the limitation of control of the past and the progression of the future. This new cultural view is ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Design + Craft

The new craft. The gap between craft and design in the nineteenth century has now become a fine line. This contemporary piece of craft, originally guild-taught, shows how it has become mass produced because of its useful function. Although its original craft has been aesthetically modified throughout time the foundation of the bicycle has remained the same and the main evolution has become the division of labour. John Ruskin believed that the liberal and mechanical principles of design influenced this division between social classes where the poor were categorised as a "tool" for crafting. This went against Ruskin and William Morris' belief that the artist "must feel" free and have an understanding of nature. This example shows how the social division no longer limits what is defined as craft or design and instead creates a common interest in art which in turn unites people and as Ruskin states, "takes a serious view of human destiny."
Post a Comment
Read more