Skip to main content

Beauty + Utility


It seems we can take nature with us everywhere, even in it's pine-scented freshness.

This classic air freshener is a contemporary representation of what A.W.N Pugin stood against; a constructed ornament that was an imitation of nature with a "cheap and false magnificence." Design reformers that later followed such as Henry Cole + Richard Redgrave and Owen Jones all believed in these same principles and tried to educate society in the mid 19th century in regards to what they considered to be true and false aspects of design.

Owen Jones in particular believed in Pugin's ideals of design and although they were originally based upon gothic architecture, Jones applied these rules of beauty and utility to the Art Nouveau movement in his book, 'Grammer of Ornament,' in 1856. He looked to nature to define laws and focused on flat patterns, geometric shape, repetition and abstraction in his work during the British design reform movement.

Jones believed that, "construction should be decorated, decoration should never be purposely constructed." With evidence given in respect to prioritizing the function of design first and foremost before it can appeal to our sensuous impulse, I do agree with the idea that design should be utilized and not only be beautifully stationary.

image used from website Auto Express:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Politics of Design- the 3D world

3D movies- hype or justified purchase? The American National Exhibition in Sokolniki Park, Moscow, 1959 showed the ideology of design through images of what was considered as ‘happy’ families because of what the American society thought each individual needed. This idea is still implemented today through the idea that 3D viewing is an ‘enhancement’ to our cinematic industry. 2D viewing is no longer enough and so is slowly being replaced in cinemas and even in our own homes with TVs and video games specializing in the 3D world. With this growing technology our ‘needs’ grow and therefore our environment becomes ‘better’ and in turn so do we. Perhaps it implicates a false impression of status- that we can pay to own the experience of having things appear 3D in front of us although the feeling of what’s real is lost. Sure, we can reach into a virtual cave or building but it is a ghost effect, the imitation takes away from the authentic an...